For the second time in under a week reports of Facebook eliminating photographs it deems profane or demeaning have people slamming the social media titan

From Human's Love
Revision as of 16:19, 2 August 2020 by Winewren30 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Facebook mentioned the image violated the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, which says: "You WOn't upload content that: is hate language, endangering, or mature;...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Facebook mentioned the image violated the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, which says: "You WOn't upload content that: is hate language, endangering, or mature; incites physical violence; or contains nudity or gratuitous or explicit physical violence.".
According to blondes on a beach , it's going to get rid of images "if they consist of nudity, substance abuse or another profane content. If beach freedom attacks an added specific or team, it'll be gotten rid of also.".
The photo was released by the internet publication Theories of the Deep Comprehension of Things as a evaluation of Facebook's policy of erasing obscene pictures. Within beach blondes of the publishing, Facebook erased the picture because it believed the elbows were actually chests according to Gawker.
Theories published on it's Facebook page: ""So, below's last evening's FB alertness evaluation results: FB mediators can not advise an elbow from a dangerous, unclean, amazing and violent female breast.)

Retrieved from "https://humanlove.stream/index.php?title=For_the_second_time_in_under_a_week_reports_of_Facebook_eliminating_photographs_it_deems_profane_or_demeaning_have_people_slamming_the_social_media_titan&oldid=519856"